Mifid II day of reckoning

Mifid II day of reckoning

The day of reckoning arrived for banks, brokers and asset managers this month as Mifid II finally came into force on January 3, 2018. The Financial Instruments Directive II (Mifid II) – a wide-ranging set of rules that affect everything from stock trading to analysts’ pay –  is designed to of promote greater investor protection and…

The day of reckoning arrived for banks, brokers and asset managers this month as Mifid II finally came into force on January 3, 2018.

The Financial Instruments Directive II (Mifid II) – a wide-ranging set of rules that affect everything from stock trading to analysts’ pay –  is designed to of promote greater investor protection and transparency and build on its predecessor MiFID I.

But while most industry professionals agree with its aims, many complain that Mifid II rules, which are said to run to 1.5 million paragraphs of text – have soaked up too much time and talent. Risk managers have worked around the clock with others in the affected firms to ensure that their organisations comply with the rules. That task has been made difficult because the rules have been under development and many in the market are unsure whether they have done enough.

One banker told the Financial Times that “the stream of eleventh-hour clarifications and approvals by European regulators” had made it harder to comply. The US stock exchange operator Nasdaq only won approval to operate Mifid-complaint services at the end of December, according to the paper.

Despite companies spending billions of pounds to upgrade IT systems and compliance procedures, many are still not ready.

Mifid I already required organisations to have a risk management function and maintain risk management policies and procedures to identify risks relating to the organisation’s activities – as well as risk mitigation and appetite procedures. But the scale of the new rules means that compliance with new procedures is likely to be complex. For example, providing extra transparency over how research is funded and paid for – known as unbundling, could be tricky because at the moment the price of market research is hidden in trade execution fees.

The UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), which regulates the sector, has said it will is not likely to take formal action against firms not fully compliant with the revised directive straight away. But they will need to show they are making their best efforts to comply. How long that approach will last is anyone’s guess.

 





← Previous

Facilitating effective crisis leadership
The highly disruptive world in which we live means that the need for organisations to…






Next →

FT–ICSA Boardroom Bellwether survey Winter 2017
The FT–ICSA Boardroom Bellwether is a twice-yearly survey of FTSE 350 companies that seeks to…

14 OCTOBER 2026

AI Transforming Enterprise Risk Management Activities

Risk management has changed considerably over the years, with new frameworks, standards and expectations shaping the way organisations manage risk. However, many of the day-to-day activities within Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) functions have remained much the same.

Find out more

22 OCTOBER 2026

Building safe agents

Hosted by Adam Grainger and Adam David, discover the foundations (training data), move through adversarial testing (red teaming), and end with operational resilience (incident management).

Find out more

16 NOVEMBER 2026

IRM Student Webinar

This session is suitable for anyone considering an IRM qualification, whether you are exploring IRM’s International Certificates or the newly launched IRM Awards.

The webinar will be particularly relevant to professionals working directly in risk management, those with risk responsibilities as part of a wider role, and individuals looking to build, refresh or expand their knowledge of risk management.

Find out more

Advertisement