Directors reach settlement in alleged cartel case

Anti-competitive practices have moved up the agenda after the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) secured the disqualification of two former directors of the construction company CPM Group Ltd in April following the business’ admission that it breached competition law.

The move follows the CMA’s statement of objections issued on 13 December 2018, alleging that 3 suppliers of pre-cast concrete drainage products – CPM Group Ltd (CPM), Stanton Bonna Ltd, and FP McCann Ltd – breached competition law by taking part in a secret cartel for almost seven years from 2006. 

The CMA has provisionally found that the cartel aimed to fix or coordinate prices and share out the market for certain pre-cast concrete drainage products in Great Britain, it said in April.


As part of a settlement process, Somerset-based CPM and Derbyshire-based Stanton Bonna Ltd admitted to participating in the alleged cartel and have agreed to pay fines, which will be determined at the end of the CMA’s investigation. The CMA’s investigation into a third company which has not entered into settlement, FP McCann Ltd, continues and no assumption should be made that it has infringed the law.

Philip Michael Stacey and Robert James Taylor Smillie were directors at CPM throughout the period of the alleged cartel activity, during which time the company was one of the leading players in the market. The CMA has secured legally binding undertakings from these former directors, which disqualify them as directors and prevent them from being involved in the management of any company based in England, Scotland and Wales.

Stacey has been disqualified for 7 years and 6 months, and Smillie has been disqualified for 6 years and 6 months.

The rules

Under the Company Directors Disqualification Act, the CMA has the power to apply to the court to disqualify a director from holding company directorships or performing certain roles in relation to a company for a specified period, if a company which he or she is a director of has breached competition law. The Act also allows the CMA to accept a disqualification undertaking from a director instead of bringing proceedings, which has the same legal effect as a disqualification order.

Directors need to keep abreast of what is going on in their companies’ affairs to spot and stop any illegal practices as soon as possible. That includes investigating any suspected illegal business practices and taking immediate steps to stop them and seek independent legal advice.

Key competition law compliance questions include:

  • What are our present competition law compliance risks?
  • What are the high, medium and low risks?
  • What measures are we taking to mitigate these risks?
  • When are we next reviewing the effectiveness of these measures?

For information on CMA’s cases, compliance guidance and more, click here.

For the IRM and CMA’s risk guidance, click here.

  • About Enterprise Risk Magazine

    Enterprise Risk Magazine is the leading quarterly title for risk managers and enterprise risk, with a print circulation of over 5,500.

    Enterprise Risk is published on behalf of the Institute of Risk Management (IRM). The majority of IRM members receive their copy of Enterprise Risk at their home address, meaning the title... Read more
  • Categories

  • Tags