Directors reach settlement in alleged cartel case

Directors reach settlement in alleged cartel case

Anti-competitive practices have moved up the agenda after the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) secured the disqualification of two former directors of the construction company CPM Group Ltd in April following the business’ admission that it breached competition law. The move follows the CMA’s statement of objections issued on 13 December 2018, alleging that 3 suppliers of pre-cast…

Anti-competitive practices have moved up the agenda after the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) secured the disqualification of two former directors of the construction company CPM Group Ltd in April following the business’ admission that it breached competition law.

The move follows the CMA’s statement of objections issued on 13 December 2018, alleging that 3 suppliers of pre-cast concrete drainage products – CPM Group Ltd (CPM), Stanton Bonna Ltd, and FP McCann Ltd – breached competition law by taking part in a secret cartel for almost seven years from 2006. 

The CMA has provisionally found that the cartel aimed to fix or coordinate prices and share out the market for certain pre-cast concrete drainage products in Great Britain, it said in April.

Settlement

As part of a settlement process, Somerset-based CPM and Derbyshire-based Stanton Bonna Ltd admitted to participating in the alleged cartel and have agreed to pay fines, which will be determined at the end of the CMA’s investigation. The CMA’s investigation into a third company which has not entered into settlement, FP McCann Ltd, continues and no assumption should be made that it has infringed the law.

Philip Michael Stacey and Robert James Taylor Smillie were directors at CPM throughout the period of the alleged cartel activity, during which time the company was one of the leading players in the market. The CMA has secured legally binding undertakings from these former directors, which disqualify them as directors and prevent them from being involved in the management of any company based in England, Scotland and Wales.

Stacey has been disqualified for 7 years and 6 months, and Smillie has been disqualified for 6 years and 6 months.

The rules

Under the Company Directors Disqualification Act, the CMA has the power to apply to the court to disqualify a director from holding company directorships or performing certain roles in relation to a company for a specified period, if a company which he or she is a director of has breached competition law. The Act also allows the CMA to accept a disqualification undertaking from a director instead of bringing proceedings, which has the same legal effect as a disqualification order.

Directors need to keep abreast of what is going on in their companies’ affairs to spot and stop any illegal practices as soon as possible. That includes investigating any suspected illegal business practices and taking immediate steps to stop them and seek independent legal advice.

Key competition law compliance questions include:

  • What are our present competition law compliance risks?
  • What are the high, medium and low risks?
  • What measures are we taking to mitigate these risks?
  • When are we next reviewing the effectiveness of these measures?

For information on CMA’s cases, compliance guidance and more, click here.

For the IRM and CMA’s risk guidance, click here.





← Previous

Embedding risk management – the formal and informal
Embedding risk management is often seen as the holy grail of an effective organisation. Research…






Next →

Cyber skills shortage adds to attack threat
Cyber security professionals say adversaries have an overwhelming upper hand in the war to protect…

9 SEPTEMBER 2026

Owning your space: confidence, visibility & voice

This event marks the formal public launch of the IRM Women in Risk Special Interest Group. The session is themed around the most pressing personal and professional challenges identified by women in the risk profession today.

Find out more

10 SEPTEMBER 2026

Beyond compliance

Managing equity compensation risk through automation, governance and the unified equity compensation risk & automation framework (UECRAF).

Find out more

17 SEPTEMBER 2026

Building an effective risk culture in your organisation

The proactive cultivation of an effective risk culture can serve as a strategic differentiator, enhancing the organisation’s resilience, agility, and reputation in the eyes of customers, investors, and regulators alike.

Find out more

Advertisement